Recording: Wolfgang
Helbich, I Febiarmonici/Alsfelder Vokalensemble; Dorothee Mields, soprano; Henning Voss, counter-tenor; Henning Kaiser, tenor; Ralf Grobe, bass
So right off the bat, for clarification: this week’s cantata is not by Johann Sebastian Bach, but (probably) composed by his second cousin Johann Ludwig Bach (1677-1731), resident of and Kapellmeister in Meiningen, a town about 100 miles as the crow (Krähe) flies southwest of Leipzig. Sometimes referred to as the “Meiningen Bach”, he was a prolific composer of sacred music. Modern sources state that J.S. made a clear copy in his own hand of this cantata and performed it (as well as some of J.L.’s other cantatas) in Leipzig in 1726, thus confounding the subsequent two centuries of Bach cataloguing.
So right off the bat, for clarification: this week’s cantata is not by Johann Sebastian Bach, but (probably) composed by his second cousin Johann Ludwig Bach (1677-1731), resident of and Kapellmeister in Meiningen, a town about 100 miles as the crow (Krähe) flies southwest of Leipzig. Sometimes referred to as the “Meiningen Bach”, he was a prolific composer of sacred music. Modern sources state that J.S. made a clear copy in his own hand of this cantata and performed it (as well as some of J.L.’s other cantatas) in Leipzig in 1726, thus confounding the subsequent two centuries of Bach cataloguing.
Why
take time to work on this cantata when about 185 others indisputably by the
master’s hand still await my study? For several reasons, principal among which is
the very obvious question, when you pick up the piano-vocal score – why did
anyone ever think this was composed by J.S? It’s so obvious, looking at the construction
of the piece, that this music did not come from his hand. Hubert Parry (in his
J.S. Bach biography) picks up on all the clues but fails to solve the mystery:
“in some respects…the style is bald and crude”; “the treatment of the strings
is dull and commonplace”; “the solo movements are very limited in scope”; “there
is a lack of development, a lack of richness in polyphony” and so on. You would
have thought the authorship question would have dawned on him at some point –
this was not a dense man – but the conventional thinking was that BWV 15 was an
early work of J.S. Bach, probably written before 1710. But if you accept that
theory, the question then becomes: how do you get from this, to BWV 4, one of
the greatest of the choral cantatas and also reputedly of that vintage?
Of
course, Parry and other biographers of this era were working with very little
scholarly information. They were presented in the Breitkopf & Härtel
complete edition with a fait accompli
– a score based on a manuscript in the master’s own hand, and incidentally the
edition was authorized by the Bach-Gesellschaft, which was led by Moritz Hauptmann
(a successor of Bach’s at the St. Thomaskirche) and included among its founders
Robert Schumann. Would you want to be the person to throw out one of the “surviving”
cantatas from the canon based on circumstantial evidence?
I figured if someone had recorded this cantata, I would take a look and a listen – it’s all about learning, correct? And someone has recorded it, along with the other “apocryphal” cantatas. By doing so, Wolfgang Helbich and his excellent orchestra and choir have documented a missing link that could all too easily have been forgotten. (By the way, they have done many similar tasks for the cpo label: another interesting path to investigate).
I figured if someone had recorded this cantata, I would take a look and a listen – it’s all about learning, correct? And someone has recorded it, along with the other “apocryphal” cantatas. By doing so, Wolfgang Helbich and his excellent orchestra and choir have documented a missing link that could all too easily have been forgotten. (By the way, they have done many similar tasks for the cpo label: another interesting path to investigate).
While
waiting on the recording to arrive, I sat down with the vocal score and read
through it – it’s simple enough that even I can play most of it, and for
professional singers it would be pretty easy sight-reading. Time and again, the
inescapable truth presented itself – this couldn’t possibly be a J.S. Bach
composition. The composer of this work, knowledgeable and a diligent craftsman,
had no creative spark. He liked C major. He liked writing vocal parts in
thirds. He liked 4/4 and 3/4 time, and he liked ensembles. Thus we have a
couple duets, a terzetto, and a brief solo quartet. He preferred, as the CD
liner notes would have it “songlike concision” in his arias, which makes them
seem truncated. The range of the soprano aria is lower than any that J.S. ever
wrote, going down to G3, probably not a note a boy soprano has. Overall the
vocal lines do not lie very well: often the orchestration, despite the
conductor’s efforts, cancels out the voice.
The
echoes of the late 17th-century are felt, and at times the use of the
brass recalls Handel, who around 1710 was himself a German Kapellmeister. In setting the text about mocking death, J.L.
provides word-painting that seems straight out of Baroque opera:
Excerpt from Movement No. 7 (Duetto) - Ich jauchze, ich lache
Ha, ha!
Nevertheless,
this is not an unpleasant work to listen to – it’s charming in its way, and
where it can have some use today would be as a training vehicle for younger
singers at a high school and college level. The tenor aria Entsetzet euch nicht in particular is enjoyable listening, not
technically difficult, and lasts only two minutes – perfect for an Easter
offertory. And there’s no better way to
appreciate the genius of the Leipzig Bach than to work on a piece like this and
then move on to a work by J.S. In fact, my hunch is that you can even
appreciate a bit of that genius within this piece – there are some stylistic discontinuities
(e.g. the introductions to the duets, and possibly the final page of the
closing chorale) that have the distinct feeling of being “improvements”.
But
J.L. was by all accounts an estimable man and made his own contribution to
music history. From 1711-1731, he was music director of the Meiningen Court
Orchestra (Meininger Hofkapelle), then recently founded
(1690) but now one of the oldest orchestras in Europe. His successors in that
position have included Hans von Bülow, Richard Strauss, and Max Reger – not a bad
roster! And today the position is held by…Swiss conductor Philippe Bach.
One
question I’ve asked myself (and been asked) is whether the BWV sequential
approach to studying the cantatas is a good approach. I can’t answer that yet,
but what I can say definitely is that – regardless of the order – it is a
privilege to be immersed in this world that transcends time and culture, that
speaks from and to the very highest aspirations of human nature. This privilege
would not be possible for me as a part-time musician and Bach student without
the comprehensive resources developed by the late Craig Smith at Emmanuel
Church in Boston, who initiated weekly cantata performances as part of worship
services http://www.emmanuelboston.org/community/emmanuel-music/. Every week of this project, I
have access to an excellent English translation prepared by Pamela Dellal for
those programs, saving a huge amount of time – I would never get to spend time
actually studying the music if I had to do all that translation!
At
this link, you will also find an interview with director Peter Sellars, who
staged numerous concerts, including cantatas, at Emmanuel Church, and speaks
movingly of the “deeply practical” nature of the cantatas, which he believes
speak to “lived experiences”. Emmanuel Church, located several blocks from the
site of the marathon bombings, performed BWV 112, Der Herr ist mein getreuer Hirt (The Lord is my shepherd) this past
Sunday.
No comments:
Post a Comment